New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009

E Mayfield v. B Tinker

E Mayfield v. B Tinker
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided January 26, 2009

E Mayfield v. B Tinker

Opinion

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 EARL MAYFIELD, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 28,701 BILL T. TINKER, 6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Linda M. Vanzi, District Judge Earl Mayfield Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant Bill T. Tinker Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION CASTILLO, Judge.

17 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

2 Affirmed.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 ________________________________ 5 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge WE CONCUR:

7 ________________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

9 ________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.