New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2010

C' de Baca v. C' de Baca

C' de Baca v. C' de Baca
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided November 5, 2010

C' de Baca v. C' de Baca

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 DAVID LORENZO C’ DE BACA, 8 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 30,483 VICTORIA VASYLIVNA C’ DE BACA, 11 Respondent-Appellee.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY John F. Davis, District Judge David Lorenzo C’ de Baca Corrales, NM Pro se Appellant Victoria Vasylivna C’ de Baca Rio Rancho, NM Pro se Appellee

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION CASTILLO, Judge.

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 Affirmed.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 ___________________________________ 7 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge WE CONCUR:

9 __________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

11 __________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.