State v. Esparza
State v. Esparza
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 30,462 MARIA ESPARZA, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Teddy L. Hartley, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Andrew S. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Patrick J. Martinez Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 Defendant appealed the district court’s entry of a conditional discharge and unsupervised probation following Defendant’s appeal of her conviction in magistrate court of resisting, evading, or obstructing an officer in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-1 (1981). On appeal, Defendant argued that the district court improperly accepted a plea from her without complying with the protections afforded by Rule 5-303(F) NMRA. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to reverse.
7 The State has filed a memorandum in response to this Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition, stating that it does not oppose reversal on the grounds stated in the calendar notice. This Court therefore reverses the district court for the reasons set out in our notice of proposed disposition.
11 IT IS SO ORDERED.
12 __________________________________ 13 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge WE CONCUR:
15 _________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
17 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.