City of Rio Rancho v. Frost
City of Rio Rancho v. Frost
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 29,998 DALE FROST, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY John F. Davis, District Judge City of Rio Rancho James C. Babin, City Attorney Gina R. Manfredi, Assistant City Attorney Rio Rancho, NM for Appellee Jay R. Mueller Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Chief Judge.
24 This Court’s calendar notice filed on January 13, 2010, proposed summary affirmance. On February 2, 2010, Plaintiff City of Rio Rancho (the City) filed a memorandum in support of the proposed summary affirmance set forth in the calendar notice. Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in this Court’s calendar notice, we affirm the order of dismissal and the order denying the motion to reconsider.
5 AFFIRMED.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:
11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
13 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.