Cohen v. CMC Const.
Cohen v. CMC Const.
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MIKE COHEN, 8 Worker-Appellant, v. No. 30,336 CMC CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF N.M., and BUILDERS TRUST, 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
13 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Terry S. Kramer, District Judge Titus & Murphy Law Firm Victor A. Titus Farmington, NM for Appellant David L. Skinner Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 ________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
11 ________________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.