Jordan v. Ten Thousand Waves
Jordan v. Ten Thousand Waves
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO SHARON JORDON, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 30,088 TEN THOUSAND WAVES, INC. and DUKE KLAUCK, 12 Defendants-Appellees.
13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge Voorhees Law Firm, P.C.
16 Scott F. Voorhees Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Hinkle, Hensley, Shanor & Martin, LLP Dana Simmons Hardy William P. Slattery Santa Fe, NM for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Chief Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge WE CONCUR:
9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.