Romero v. Sedillo
Romero v. Sedillo
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.
9 ROMAN R. ROMERO, d/b/a THE ROMERO LAW FIRM, P.A.
11 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 29,913 THE HONORABLE FRANK A. SEDILLO, METROPOLITAN COURT JUDGE (Div. V), 15 Respondent-Appellee, and involving D. RUSCH GATHINGS, d/b/a THE LAW OFFICE OF D. RUSCH GATHINGS, 19 Defendant, and THE HONORABLE GERALDINE E. RIVERA, District Court Judge.
23 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Geraldine E. Rivera, District Judge The Romero Law Firm, P.A.
26 Roman R. Romero Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Law Office of D. Rusch Gathings D. Rusch Gathings Albuquerque, NM for Defendant
8 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
10 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
13 Affirmed.
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
19 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
21 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.