Cook v. Wells Fargo Bank
Cook v. Wells Fargo Bank
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 DANIEL W. COOK, 8 Defendant-Appellant, v. NO. 29,523 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK NEW MEXICO, N.A., 13 Plaintiff-Appellee.
14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Ted Baca, District Judge Daniel W. Cook Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant Sutin, Thayer & Browne, P.C.
20 Michelle K. Ostrye Jay D. Hertz Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
2 Appellant appeals an order granting summary judgment and an order denying various motions filed by Appellant. We proposed to dismiss the appeal in a calendar notice. After the orders were entered below, Appellant filed motions to vacate the summary judgment, to stay the judgment, to hold a new hearing, and to reconsider the summary judgment order. We explained that the orders appealed from were not final for purposes of appeal. In response, Appellant filed a Request for Return of Case to District Court, and Appellee filed a response to Appellant’s request. Appellee agrees that the case should be dismissed and remanded to the district court.
10 Based on the discussion in our calendar notice, we hold that the orders appealed from are not final. We dismiss the appeal and remand the case to the district court.
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14 ______________________________ 15 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:
17 _______________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
1 _______________________________ MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.