Coronel v. Clayton Homes
Coronel v. Clayton Homes
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 RAMON S. CORONEL, 8 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 31,379 CLAYTON HOMES, d/b/a KARSTEN HOMES and BROADSPIRE, 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
13 APPEAL FROM WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge Ramon S. Coronel Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant Hale & Dixon, P.C.
19 Timothy S. Hale Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
4 Affirmed.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 ______________________________ 7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 __________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
11 __________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.