New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2011

Orthman v. Orthman

Orthman v. Orthman
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided October 21, 2011

Orthman v. Orthman

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KENNETH ORTHMAN, 8 Petitioner-Appellee, v. NO. 31,260 KRISTI ORTHMAN, 11 Respondent-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF UNION COUNTY John M. Paternoster, District Judge Beck & Cooper Robert O. Beck Clayton, NM for Appellee Donald Schutte Tucumcari, NM for Appellant Kamm & McConnell, LLC Terrence R. Kamm Raton, NM Guardian Ad Litem 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.

3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and in fact, Appellant has filed a Consent to Proposed Disposition.

6 Mandate shall issue forthwith.

7 DISMISSED.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:

12 _________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge

14 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.