Orthman v. Orthman
Orthman v. Orthman
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KENNETH ORTHMAN, 8 Petitioner-Appellee, v. NO. 31,260 KRISTI ORTHMAN, 11 Respondent-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF UNION COUNTY John M. Paternoster, District Judge Beck & Cooper Robert O. Beck Clayton, NM for Appellee Donald Schutte Tucumcari, NM for Appellant Kamm & McConnell, LLC Terrence R. Kamm Raton, NM Guardian Ad Litem 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.
3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and in fact, Appellant has filed a Consent to Proposed Disposition.
6 Mandate shall issue forthwith.
7 DISMISSED.
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 __________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:
12 _________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
14 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.