New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2011

State v. Mathis

State v. Mathis
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided September 16, 2011

State v. Mathis

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 31,224 COREY MATHIS, 11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Stephen K. Quinn, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee The Law Offices of Nancy L. Simmons, P.C.

18 Nancy L. Simmons Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.

1 Defendant Corey Mathis appeals his conviction for trafficking controlled substances. He asserts that the district court should have enforced an agreement he made with a State Police agent pursuant to which he would receive reduced charges and a sentence of probation if he worked for the agent as a confidential informant.

5 [DS 5] This Court filed a notice of proposed summary disposition, proposing to affirm the district court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to enforce the agreement.

7 Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition to proposed summary disposition, which we have given due consideration. Unpersuaded, we affirm the district court.

9 Defendant’s memorandum in opposition suggests that we assign this appeal to the general calendar so as to better develop the facts using the hearing transcript. We decline to do so, as the facts set forth in the docketing statement and the district court’s letter decision provide sufficient basis to affirm.

13 For the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm the district court.

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 __________________________________ 17 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:

19 _________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

2 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.