Quintana v. Tapia
Quintana v. Tapia
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DIEGO QUINTANA,
8 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 31,011 ABRAN TAPIA, LORI MARANGAKIS, and MARY GORDON, 12 Defendants-Appellees.
13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Court Judge Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP Karl H. Sommer James R. Hawley Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Keleher & McLeod, P.A.
21 Kurt Wihl Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed
1 and the time for doing so has expired.
2 REVERSED.
3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 _______________________________ 5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:
7 _________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
9 _________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.