State v. Robinson
State v. Robinson
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 30,911 MITCHELL ROBINSON, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Grant Foutz, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Ray Twohig, P.C.
18 Ray Twohig Albuquerque, NM for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
1 AFFIRMED.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 _______________________________ 4 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
5 WE CONCUR:
6 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
8 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.