Flitcraft v. Cox
Flitcraft v. Cox
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 PEGGY FLITCRAFT, 8 Petitioner-Appellee, v. NO. 31,029 WILLIAM COX, 11 Repondent-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRANT COUNTY Henry R. Quintero, District Judge Law Office of David H. Gorman, P.C.
15 David H. Gorman Silver City, NM for Appellee Peter A. Keys Silver City, NM for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
1 AFFIRMED.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 __________________________________ 4 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
5 WE CONCUR:
6 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
8 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.