Hardesty v. State Farm
Hardesty v. State Farm
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO EVELYN HARDESTY,
8 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 30,886 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and EVELYN JOY COOKSEY, 13 Defendants-Appellees.
14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY Thomas A. Rutledge, District Court Judge Law Office of Shawn J. Lunsford Shawn J. Lunsford Carlsbad, NM for Appellant Atwood, Malone, Turner & Sabin Lee M. Rogers, Jr. Roswell, NM for Appellees 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
11 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.