New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2011

State v. Caleron

State v. Caleron
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided May 31, 2011

State v. Caleron

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 30,667 HUGO CALDERON, 11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Fernando Macias, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Herman E. Ortiz Las Cruces, NM for Appellant 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

1 AFFIRMED.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 _______________________________ 4 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

5 WE CONCUR:

6 _________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

8 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.