1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO GREG DEITCH and JUDY DEITCH,

8 Plaintiffs, v. NO. 31,089 SHANE and ANNE JOHNSON, 11 Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RICHARDS FURTH PC & BEN FURTH, 14 Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY James W. Counts, District Court Judge John R. Hakanson, P.C.

18 Miguel Garcia Alamogordo, NM for Appellees The Furth Law Firm, P.A.

22 Ben Furth Las Cruces, NM for Appellants 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

6 AFFIRMED.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 _______________________________ 9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

11 _________________________________ CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

13 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge