Pino v. Jaramillo
Pino v. Jaramillo
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 MICHELLE L. PINO, f/k/a, MICHELLE L. JARAMILLO, 9 Petitioner-Appellee, v. NO. 30,838 ADRIAN JARAMILLO, 12 Respondent-Appellant.
13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY John M. Pasternoster, District Judge Victoria W. Doom Las Vegas, NM for Appellee Leverick & Musselman Elizabeth A. Musselman Taos, NM for Appellant
22 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 DISMISSED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
11 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.