1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.

8 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT and ROBERTA PEKARCIK, 10 Petitioners-Appellees, v. NO. 30,744 PHILIP PEKARCIK, 13 Respondent-Appellant.

14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY David K. Thomson, District Judge McDevitt Law Firm, P.A.

17 Susan Schaefer McDevitt Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Philip Pekarcik Los Lunas, NM Pro Se Appellant

23 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 REVERSED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge