Stokes v. NMDT
Stokes v. NMDT
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 DANIEL LESTER STOKES, 8 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 30,934 NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and STATE OF NEW MEXICO RISK MANAGEMENT, 13 Employer/Insurer-Appellee.
14 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge Tony Couture, Albuquerque, NM for Appellant David L. Skinner Albuquerque, NM for Appellee
22 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
11 _________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.