New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2011

Cedrins v. Shrestha

Cedrins v. Shrestha
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided April 11, 2011

Cedrins v. Shrestha

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 INARA CEDRINS, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 30,955 RAMESH KUMAR SHRESTHA, 11 Defendant-Appellee.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Carl J. Butkus, District Judge Inara Cedrins Chicago, IL Pro Se Appellant Ramesh Kumar Shrestha Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellee

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 REVERSED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.