Intelliworks v. Janicke
Intelliworks v. Janicke
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO INTELLIWORKS DEVELOPMENT, INC., 9 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 30,757 MICHAEL JANICKE, 12 Defendant-Appellee.
13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Mary L. Marlowe, District Judge Tal Young P.C.
16 Steven Tal Young Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Silva, Saucedo & Gonzales, P.C.
20 Barbara J. Koenig Christopher Saucedo Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.