State v. Snider
State v. Snider
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 8 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 30,209 HAL RAYMOND SNIDER, III, 11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY Gary L. Clingman, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Templeman & Crutchfield, PA Barry C. Crutchfield Lovington, NM for Appellant 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
11 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.