Streavel v. Ruzzon
Streavel v. Ruzzon
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO PAUL M. STREAVEL, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 32,288 MARIKA RUZZON, 6 Respondent-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY Drew D. Tatum, District Judge Garrett Law Firm, P.A.
10 Michael T. Garrett Clovis, NM for Appellant James F. McDowell, III Clovis, NM for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 Petitioner appealed from the district court’s determination that the parties’ child could relocate to Italy with Respondent. This Court issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm the district court’s determination. Petitioner has filed a response to this Court’s notice, indicating that he will not be filing a memorandum opposing this Court’s proposed disposition.
6 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we affirm.
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 __________________________________ 10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 WE CONCUR:
12 _______________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
14 _______________________________ CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.