New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2012

Armijo v. Baumgartel

Armijo v. Baumgartel
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided November 29, 2012

Armijo v. Baumgartel

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ROBERT A. ARMIJO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 32,323 JOHN BAUMGARTEL, 6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge J. Ronald Boyd Santa Fe, NM for Appellant Keleher & McLeod, P.A.

13 Robert J. Perovich Thomas C. Bird Nathan S. Stimson Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. A memorandum in support of proposed summary affirmance was filed on behalf of Appellee.

5 AFFIRMED.

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 __________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge WE CONCUR:

10 ______________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

12 ______________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.