Montano v. Baca-Lucero
Montano v. Baca-Lucero
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 SANDRA MONTAÑO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 31,991 GLORIA BACA-LUCERO and MARY ANN BACA-LUCERO, 7 Defendants-Appellants.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY Eugenio S. Mathis, District Judge Carol A. Neelley Taos, NM for Appellee Wray & Girard, P.C.
14 Katherine Wray Duff Westbrook Albuquerque, NM for Appellants 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.