Romero v. Harshbarger
Romero v. Harshbarger
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 RICHARD ROMERO and JOANNE ROMERO, 4 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NO. 31,974 SAMUEL HARSHBARGER and LEANNA HARSHBARGER, 8 Defendants-Appellants.
9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY Louis P. McDonald, District Judge
11 Robles, Rael & Anaya, PC Douglas E. Gardner Albuquerque, NM for Appellees Samuel Harshbarger Leanna Harshbarger Rio Rancho, NM Pro Se Appellants 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 AFFIRMED.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________ 9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
13 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.