Nesbit v. McCoy
Nesbit v. McCoy
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 DALE NESBIT and PAMELA NESBIT, 4 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NO. 32,083 JERRY McCOY, 7 Defendant-Appellant.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY J. Richard Brown, District Judge
10 Martin, Dugan & Martin Lane T. Martin Mark R. Horton Carlsbad, NM for Appellees Jerry McCoy Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellant 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 AFFIRMED.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________ 9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
13 _________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.