State v. Benally
State v. Benally
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 32,112 PRESTON BENALLY, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY Robert A. Aragon, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General Margaret E. McLean, Assistant Attorney General Joel Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jacqueline L. Cooper, Chief Public Defender Sergio Viscoli, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant
18 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Judge.
1 The State appeals from an order of suppression. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. We noted that the State bears the burden of establishing reasonable suspicion to make a stop, and we proposed to hold that the district court could determine whether there was sufficient support for the stop in this case. The State informs this Court that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to our calendar notice. We therefore affirm based on the discussion in our calendar notice.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________ 9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
13 _________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.