Runyan v. Merino
Runyan v. Merino
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO WESLEY RUNYAN and JAN RUNYAN, 4 Plaintiff-Appellees, vs. NO. 31,831 EDUARDO J. MERINO, Individually and d/b/a/ J.E.M. CONSTRUCTION, 8 Defendant-Appellant, Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A.
10 Clayton S. Hightower Roswell, NM for Appellee Bernadette Sedillo Las Cruces, NM for Appellant APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY Charles C. Currier, District Judge 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 Affirmed.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.