New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2012

Carl v. Carl

Carl v. Carl
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided February 21, 2012

Carl v. Carl

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO NANCY ALLISON CARL, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 31,696 CHESTER CARL, 6 Respondent-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY Robert A. Aragon, District Judge John A. Chapela Gallup, NM for Appellant Henry S. Howe Gallup, NM for Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

1 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

4 Dismissed.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:

10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.