Armijo v. Kohls
Armijo v. Kohls
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO TIMOTHY A. ARMIJO, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 31,240 KOHLS and AIG, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge Timothy A. Armijo Santa Fe, NM Pro Se Appellant Allen, Shepherd, Lewis & Chapman, P.A.
13 Kimberly A. Syra Albuquerque, NM for Appellees 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.
18 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
19 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
1 IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:
6 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
8 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.