Franco v. Feingold
Franco v. Feingold
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IRENE FRANCO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 31,675 WILLIAM FEINGOLD, et al., 6 Defendants-Appellees.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Nan G. Nash, District Judge Irene Franco Albuquerque, NM Pro Se Appellant Simone, Roberts & Weiss PA Randal William Roberts Albuquerque, NM for Appellee William Feingold
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
4 Affirmed.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
10 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.