Strautins v. Martinez
Strautins v. Martinez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO ROBERT D. STRAUTINS; LAURENCE J.
3 and JACQUELINE N. ELLIOT; CRAIG D. and MICHELLE I. MCGREGOR; ROBERT L. and MYRA B. HULL; JOHN J. and MARY ELLEN BURKE; BURT MICHAEL and CINDY PLOTKIN; KLAUS VOIGTLANDER; and JAMES G. FARIS, 9 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 32,771 [CONSOLIDATED 11 WITH No. 32,802; No. 32,803; DOMINGO MARTINEZ, Santa No. 32,804; No. 32,805; Fe County Assessor, et al., No. 32,806; No. 32,807; and 14 No. 32,808] 15 Defendants-Appellees.
16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge L. Helen Bennett Albuquerque, NM for Appellants Bridget Jacober Santa Fe, NM for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
6 {2} Defendants-Appellees have filed a memorandum in support of the calendar notice proposing summary affirmance of dismissal.
8 {3} Affirmed.
9 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.
11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
16 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.