City of Rio Rancho v. Hogan
City of Rio Rancho v. Hogan
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 CITY OF RIO RANCHO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 32,429 SEAN HOGAN, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY John F. Davis, District Judge Gina R. Manfredi Rio Rancho, NM for Appellee Kimberly A. Middlebrooks Albuquerque, NM for Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge.
1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.