Vinyard v. Palo Alto
Vinyard v. Palo Alto
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO JODY VINYARD, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 32,832 PALO ALTO, D/B/A PIZZA HUT, and MANUFACTURER’S ALLIANCE, 7 Employer/Insurer-Appellee, Law Office of Alvin R. Garcia, LLC Alvin R. Garcia Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Maestas & Suggett, P.C.
13 Albuquerque, NM for Appellee APPEAL FROM THE NEW MEXICO WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Reginald C. Woodard, Workers’ Compensation Judge 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION GARCIA, Judge.
1 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} REVERSED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.