New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2013

State v. Hinojos

State v. Hinojos
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided March 26, 2013

State v. Hinojos

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 32,234 EZEQUIEL HINOJOS, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Don Maddox, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Collopy Law Offices Bryon Collopy Hobbs, NM for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.

18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

19 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:

6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

8 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.