Polen v. Dotco
Polen v. Dotco
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO COREY POLEN, 3 Worker-Appellant, v. NO. 32,538 DOTCO and BUILDER’S TRUST, 6 Employer/Insurer-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge Titus & Murphy Law Firm Victor A. Titus Farmington, NM for Appellant Yenson, Allen & Wosick, P.C.
14 Joseph P. Turk Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI, Judge.
1 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 REVERSED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 _________________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.