Wellknown v. Hobbs
Wellknown v. Hobbs
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 GAIL WELLKNOWN, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, v. NO. 33,184 WALTER HOBBS, 6 Respondent-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge
9 Gail Wellknown Fruitland, NM Pro Se Appellee John V. Nilan, LLC John V. Nilan Albuquerque, NM for Appellant
16 MEMORANDUM OPINION KENNEDY, Chief Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 ____________________________________ 7 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 ___________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
11 ___________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.