New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

Deaton v. Fry

Deaton v. Fry
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided February 13, 2014

Deaton v. Fry

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO HENRY D. DEATON, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 33,111 SANDRA V. FRY, MOISES GUTIERREZ, AURORA CALDWELL, and ANY AND ALL Unknown Claimants of Interest in the Premises Adverse to Plaintiff, 9 Defendants-Appellees.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Clay Campbell, District Judge Chappell Law Firm, P.A.

13 Bill Chappell, Jr. Michael Hoeferkamp Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Mark A. Glenn Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Fry Roibal Law Firm PA Edward J. Roibal Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Gutierrez Narciso Garcia, Jr. Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Caldwell

5 MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge.

7 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

10 {2} DISMISSED.

11 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 _______________________________ 13 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

14 WE CONCUR:

15 ___________________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

17 _________________________________ J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.