Castillo v. Valdez
Castillo v. Valdez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MARY HELEN CASTILLO, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 33,209 JENNIFER VALDEZ, 6 Respondent-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SIERRA COUNTY Matthew G. Reynolds, District Judge Law Office of Steven L. Almanza Steven L. Almanza Las Cruces, NM for Appellant New Mexico Legal Group Sarah M. Armstrong Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION ZAMORA, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
11 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.