State v. Martinez
State v. Martinez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 32,896 JOHN PAUL MARTINEZ, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Denise Barela-Shepherd, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Rothstein, Donatelli, Hughes, Dahlstrom, Schoenburg & Bienvenu, LLP Morgan Honeycutt Evan P. Woodward Santa Fe, NM for Appellant 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
2 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
5 {2} Affirmed.
6 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 _______________________________________ 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge WE CONCUR:
12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.