New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

Menapace v. Menapace

Menapace v. Menapace
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided April 29, 2014

Menapace v. Menapace

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KEVIN MENAPACE, 3 Petitioner-Appellant, v. NO. 33,275 DANA MENAPACE, 6 Respondent-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY Robert A. Aragon, District Judge Carter & Valle Law Firm, P.C.

10 Linda L. Ellison Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Border Law Office, P.A.

14 Dean E. Border Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION ZAMORA, Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________ 7 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 _________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.