This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NO. 32,604 EDWARD A. CLAY, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY Susan M. Riedel, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Pranava Upadrashta, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 WECHSLER, Judge.

1 {1} Defendant appealed his conviction for residential burglary. Our third calendar notice proposed to affirm his conviction. In response, Defendant has filed a notice indicating he will not file a memorandum in opposition to our latest calendar notice, but relies on the facts, authorities, and arguments contained in his initial memorandum in opposition. We remain convinced that the proposed disposition set out in our third calendar notice is correct. Therefore, for the reasons discussed in that notice, we affirm the district court’s judgment and sentence in this case.

8 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 ________________________________ 10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 ________________________________ MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

14 ________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge