Zacharias v. Arch Hurley Conservancy
Zacharias v. Arch Hurley Conservancy
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO KANDACE ZACHARIAS, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 33,553 ARCH HURLEY CONSERVANCY, 6 Defendants-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge Martin E. Threet & Associates Martin E. Threet Alonzo Maestas Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Butt, Thorton & Baehr, P.C.
15 Emily A. Franke Raul Sedillo Neysa E. Lujan Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.
1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.
2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.