New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

Montoya v. Whitchurch

Montoya v. Whitchurch
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided July 15, 2014

Montoya v. Whitchurch

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO MARK E. MONTOYA, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 33,512 REISHA WHITCHURCH, and JOSEPH A. NARVAIZ, 7 Defendants-Appellants.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Sarah M. Singleton, District Judge Mark E. Montoya Rio Rancho, NM Pro Se Appellee Reisha M. Whitchurch Santa Fe, NM Joseph A. Narvaiz Santa Fe, NM Pro Se Appellants

18 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

2 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:

9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.