Skidgel v. Macantel
Skidgel v. Macantel
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO CLIFTON SKIDGEL, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 33,574 GREGG MARCANTEL, 6 Defendant-Appellee, APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF UNION COUNTY John M. Patersnoster, District Judge Clifton R. Skidgel Clayton, NM Pro Se Appellant Simone, Roberts & Weiss, P.A.
13 Norman F. Weiss Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION FRY, Judge.
1 {1} Summary dismissal for lack of a final order was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge WE CONCUR:
9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.