New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

Gray v. Sandoval

Gray v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided June 23, 2014

Gray v. Sandoval

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STACIE MARIE GRAY f/k/a, STACIE MARIE SANDOVAL, n/k/a STACIE MARIE IVEY, 5 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NO. 33,348 consolidated 7 with NO. 33,670 MARTIN CHRISTOPHER SANDOVAL, 9 Defendant-Appellee.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Elizabeth E. Whitefield, District Judge Stacie Marie Gray Fort Collins, CO Pro Se Appellant Leslie Becker Albuquerque, NM for Appellee 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION ZAMORA, Judge.

1 {1} Appellant Stacie Marie Ivey [RP 300] (Mother) appeals pro se from the district court’s October 4, 2013, minute order [RP 370] and the February 17, 2014, final minute order [Ct.App.File, blue tab] that address matters relating to child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees. Our second calendar notice proposed to affirm. {2} 5 Mother did not file a second memorandum in opposition to the second notice.

6 Instead, Mother initiated a second appeal and filed a docketing statement in this Court in Ct.App.No. 33,670 (Case #2), where she appeals from the same district court orders at issue in this case. Because Mother is appealing from the same orders in both this case and in Case #2, we HEREBY CONSOLIDATE the appeals under this case, Ct.App.No. 33,348.

11 {3} As for the merits of Mother’s arguments, for the same reasons extensively discussed in our second calendar notice, we affirm. Mother did not file a memorandum in opposition to our second notice and we are not persuaded by her arguments. We therefore affirm.

15 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 _______________________________ 17 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge WE CONCUR:

1 ___________________________________ RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge

3 ___________________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.