State v. Farrell
State v. Farrell
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Respondent, v. No. 33,900 ORIANA FARRELL, 6 Defendant-Applicant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY John M. Paternoster, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Respondent Alan Maestas Law Office, P.C.
14 Alan H. Maestas Kathryn J. Hardy Taos, NM for Applicant 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge.
1 {1} Defendant filed an application for interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court’s refusal to dismiss the indictment brought against Defendant. We granted the application and issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to reverse. The State has filed a response indicating it is unable to offer any additional facts or legal argument to challenge the proposed disposition. The State also requests issuance of an expedited mandate, and Defendant concurs in that request. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice, we reverse the district court’s decision in this case.
8 Mandate shall issue immediately.
9 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 __________________________________ 11 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
12 WE CONCUR:
13 _______________________________ TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
15 _______________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.