New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2014

State v. Jaksha

State v. Jaksha
New Mexico Court of Appeals · Decided September 16, 2014

State v. Jaksha

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 33,442 MATTHEW JAKSHA, 6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY William G. Shoobridge, District Judge Gary K. King, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Fredlund & Bryan, LLC Jon C. Fredlund Hobbs, NM for Appellant 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION HANISEE, Judge.

18 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

19 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

1 {2} AFFIRMED.

2 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge WE CONCUR:

7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.